Theodore Gracyk
Philosophy 110: Practical Reasoning 


Sample Portfolio Page: Argument by analogy

This example has all four elements of a correct page:

  1. At the top, it labels the category of argument. 
  2. It documents the source. (Provide the same sort of documentation that would be used for a citation in a college research paper.)
  3. It identifies the issue in the form of a question. 
  4. It reconstructs the argument in standard form, then evaluates its soundness. (For the fallacies, we skip the standard form reconstruction but explain how the fallacy occurs in the example.) It explicitly states whether the argument is sound or unsound.

                                                 

   

Argument by Analogy 

 

   

Source: The Fargo Forum, 09/30/2001, page A6

Issue: Will the United States stop the growth of terrorism?

 

Standard Form Reconstruction:

1. Freezing temperatures stop growth. 
2. Freezing temperatures are like the United States. Both  are
  powerful forces.                                          
(likely) The United States will stop the growth of terrorism. 
    

 

Evaluation:
The argument commits the fallacy of faulty analogy. There are few similarities and there are relevant differences between governments and weather systems. For one thing, we can predict the seasons of the weather better than we can predict long term government policies. The fact that freezing temperatures come each year is beyond human control. But government action is under our control. While freezing temperatures come every fall, perhaps the American people will not have the patience to back a long war on terrorism and so the U.S. will not really stop the growth of terrorism.

This argument is unsound.

 

 

Return to Practical
Reasoning Home Page
Return to 
Theodore Gracyk's
Homepage
 
                       
  

 

    Last updated January 8, 2003