SHORT-TERM RETENTION
CHAPTER 8
I. GENERAL ISSUES
A. Short-term memory (STM) deals with the information storage system that has a limited capacity and duration, and is typically studied in contrast to long-term memory (LTM), which has virtually no capacity or duration-based restrictions.
B. STM is critical for virtually everything we do, as it serves as a mental workspace that is used and reused constantly.
II. DEFINITIONS
A. William James, one of the American founders of Psychology, made an early distinction between what is now referred to as STM and LTM. James referred to these processes as primary and secondary memory.
1. Primary memory is information that is currently in one’s consciousness.
2. Secondary memory is absent from current consciousness and is part of one’s psychological past.
B. Waugh & Norman added to our knowledge of memory by arguing that recall can come from either primary or secondary memory.
C. Atkinson & Shiffrin (1968) developed what has come to be known as the “modal model” of memory.
1. The Short Term Store (STS) is responsible for temporary processing, governed by Working Memory control processes.
2. The Long Term Store is a permanent storage system, receiving data from STS.
III. SHORT-TERM MEMORY TASKS
A. One way that STM ability is assessed is via the implementation of the Brown-Peterson task.
1. The task requires subjects to attend to some type of stimulus (e.g., a set of words, a nonsense syllable, etc.), and then after presentation of the stimulus, subjects are required to count backwards by 3s from a given number (e.g., 124).
2. After a given amount of time (e.g., 3, 9, 12 seconds), subjects are told to stop counting and recall the initially presented stimulus.
3. Performance on the task reveals how much (or little) information can be held in STM without rehearsal (the counting task, ideally, acts as a distractor, preventing rehearsal of the critical stimulus).
B. Although the lack of rehearsal is one explanation for the memory loss demonstrated on the Brown-Peterson task, other possibilities stem from interference.
1. Proactive interference occurs when one’s memory to retain information is prevented by information that is encountered before the critical information is presented.
C. Beyond the Brown-Peterson task, the Memory Span task is also used to assess STM.
1. Memory Span is defined as the longest sequence of information that can be accurately recalled, in order of initial presentation.
2. An example of the task would be to present a sequence of random numbers to a subject, and, without delay, have then recall the sequence following the presentation of the final number in the sequence.
3. The maximum span for a healthy adult is in the range of 5-9 items (although there have been a few extraordinary individuals over the years who have had memory spans well above this!).
George Miller (1956)—“The magic number seven, plus or minus two"
Two main findings:
(a) Ss are unable to identify a
set of items that vary along only one dimension if there are more than a few
items
Increase capacity of short-term memory by grouping individual units of information into meaningful units.
4. One limitation to memory span is the Word Length Effect, which basically argues that longer words are more difficult to recall than shorter words (e.g., short words (man, dog) are recalled better than long words (gentleman, canine)).
Baddeley,
Thomson, and Buchanan (1975)--word length and pronunciation time.
As
the number of syllables in the words increased, the proportion of words that
could be recalled decreased.
Results--linear relationship
between how long it takes to pronounce a word and the level of recall.
Working Memory explanation--number of items that can be immediately recalled
depends on how often each item can be subvocally rehearsed by the articulatory
control process
The
shorter the items, the more items can be rehearsed before a particular trace
decays.
5. Other individual differences, such as one’s familiarity with the stimuli, may also play a role in the size of one’s memory span.
IV. CHARACTERISTICS OF VERBAL SHORT-TERM RETENTION
A. A variety of features have been found to differentiate STM from LTM.
1. Much, although not all, of the encoding that occurs in STM is acoustic, whereas LTM tends to be more semantic.
2. STM’s capacity is limited to 5-9 pieces of information, whereas LTM is virtually limitless.
3. The duration that information can be held in STM, without rehearsal, is approximately 15-30 seconds.
4. Forgetting in STM can occur due to a fading of the memory trace, which causes the memory to not exist. In LTM, by contrast, forgetting is based more on interference or retrieval problems, which means that the memory exists, but is just blocked.
V. OTHER MODALITIES OF SHORT-TERM MEMORY
A. Beyond the typical acoustic code, information in STM can be encoded in a variety of other ways.
1. Visual Imagery codes
2. Spatial codes
3. Motor/Action codes
4. Olfactory codes
VI. WORKING MEMORY
A. Working memory elaborates on the concept of STM by including both a place for storage of information, as well as a way in which to control those storage systems and process information.
Does STS really serve as a general, unitary working
memory where storage and manipulation compete for space in a limited capacity
STS?
Evidence:
Use dual-task technique--S is required to perform one task
that absorbs most of the capacity of his/her working memory, while at the same
time performing learning, reasoning or comprehension tasks.
Assumption: Performing a concurrent STM task should lead to a
dramatic impairment in performance.
Baddeley (1986)--Ss were
required to remember number sequences ranging from zero to eight digits in
length, while at the same time performing a reasoning test.
Effect of concurrent memory load on the
speed and accuracy with which Ss performed the syntactic reasoning test:
Results: (1) reasoning time increases clearly and systematically with concurrent memory load (2) The effect, however, is not catastrophic.
If STS is a unitary system, a concurrent load of eight digits
should cause reasoning performance to break down completely. It does not.
B. Noting that STM seemed a bit restrictive, Baddeley & Hitch (1974) proposed that STM be altered into what they called Working Memory, which has several components.
1. The Phonological Loop is responsible for the immediate storage and rehearsal of verbal information.
a. This is comparable to verbal Short Term Memory.
Purpose: account for evidence regarding importance of speech
coding in STM
Helps to explain
the following phenomena:
(1)
Phonological similarity effect-- memory is worse for items that sound alike than
for items that differ.
PGTCD
is harder to recall from memory than the sequence RHXKW
2. The Visuospatial Sketchpad is responsible for processing images and other spatial information.
a. This is comparable to visual and spatial Short Term Memory systems; research suggests that these are indeed separate processing mechanisms.
3. The Episodic Buffer acts as a bridge between information in phonological or visuospatial memory and LTM.
a. This system is a relatively new addition to the classic Working Memory model.
b. The Buffer integrates information across the phonological/visual stores, the central executive, and LTM.
4. The Central Executive controls the different subsystems of Working Memory by directing attentional resources to the subsystems as needed.
C. Working Memory & Consciousness
1. Consciousness, although not part of Working Memory, has been implicated as directing the functioning of the components of this system.
2. A related issue is the consciousness binding problem, which attempts to understand how the mind integrates what is represented in different coding forms (e.g., visual, verbal, etc.).
Phonological loop activity
Sketchpad
activity
VII. INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN WORKING MEMORY
A. The aging process influences Working Memory.
1. Aging tends to slow down the rate at which information is processed.
2. Aging also seems to inhibit one’s ability to screen out irrelevant information, resulting in the Central Executive system using attentional resource in a nonproductive manner.
3. The lack of attentional control also leads weaker encoding of critical information.
B. One’s anxiety level can also impact the functioning of Working Memory.
1. The activation of a negative mental stereotype, when perceived by a person who is the target of the stereotype, has been found to compromise Working Memory in the affected individual.
******************************
Phonological
loop = phonological store +
articulatory control process
Helps to explain
the following phenomena:
(1)
Phonological similarity effect-- memory is worse for items that sound alike than
for items that differ.
PGTCD
is harder to recall from memory than the sequence RHXKW
Assumed
to occur because the store is based on a phonological code, so similar items
will have similar codes. Recall
will require discriminating among the memory traces.
Similar traces will be harder to discriminate, leading to a lower level
of recall.
(2) Articulatory suppression--Ss
say a word, such as “the,” over and over out loud.
Assumption: Repeating “the” occupies the
articulatory control process. Should be no covert rehearsal using the
articulatory control process. Without covert rehearsal, visual information cannot be
translated into a phonological code and so cannot be placed into the
phonological store. Should be no phonological similarity effect.
Should
still be a phonological similarity effect for auditory items.
Results
support predictions
(3) Unattended or irrelevant speech effect—unattended verbal material impairs
recall
Colle
and Welsh (1976) had two groups of Ss recall visually presented consonants, but
one group saw the consonants while some irrelevant speech was played in the
background.
Relative
to the Ss in the quiet condition, Ss who heard irrelevant speech were not as
successful in recalling the information.
Assumption:
phonemes from the irrelevant speech enter into the phonological store and
interfere with the information about the visually presented items.
**The
unattended material (nonsense syllables disrupt performance to the same extent
as words) was gaining access to the phonological store, a store that holds
phonological but not semantic information.
What
about unattended music? (Salame & Baddeley, 1989)
(4)
Word-length effect--short words (man, dog) are recalled better than long
words (gentleman, canine).
Baddeley,
Thomson, and Buchanan (1975)--word length and pronunciation time.
As
the number of syllables in the words increased, the proportion of words that
could be recalled decreased.
Results--linear relationship
between how long it takes to pronounce a word and the level of recall.
Working Memory explanation--number of items that can be immediately recalled
depends on how often each item can be subvocally rehearsed by the articulatory
control process
The
shorter the items, the more items can be rehearsed before a particular trace
decays.
Immediate memory is where
“cognitive work” is performed
*************************************************************************************************************************
EXTRA--IF TIME
Let's turn our attention to sensory memory:
Modality and Suffix Effects
Modality effects—In general, Ss are presented a series of items (digits 1-9), and are asked to recall them in order (serial recall).
Results--Auditory and visual presentation produce almost the same result. Exception: Large advantage for the last one or two items in the list with auditory presentation (recency effect) compared to visual presentation.
Conrad & Hull (1968)--Ss read items aloud or silently
Big advantage for the last item (80% correct recall vs. about 20% correct recall) for auditory presentation.
Suffix effect—applies only when the presentation modality of the to-be-remembered items is auditory.
In the suffix condition, an extra item follows the last to-be-remembered item.
Subject is told to ignore the suffix or to treat it merely as a sign to begin recall.
Suffix dramatically reduces recall of the final item.
Crowder and Morton (1969)—non-speech sound (buzzer) did not disrupt performance.
Meaning of the suffix was not important; any speech sound will impair performance.
Interpretation—brief precategorical acoustic store.