Chapter 4: Infant Perception and
Cognition
I. Methodologies used to assess infant perception
A.
Infant sucking
B.
Visual preference
C.
Habituation/dishabituation
1.
Operationalized as amount of time infant attends to stimuli – more familiar
stimuli receive less attention (see Figure 4-2)
2.
Habituation – decrease in response with familiarity
3.
Dishabituation (release from habituation) – resumption of response when stimulus
is changed
II.
The development of visual perception
A.
Vision in the newborn
1.
Can perceive light, but cannot accommodate for distance
2.
Can track but eyes do not converge and coordinate until about 6 months
3.
Acuity poor at birth, improves over 1st year (See Fig. 4-3)
4.
Color perception poor initially but improves by 8 weeks
B.
The development of visual preferences - prefer movement, high contrast,
symmetry, and curvature
C.
Psychological stimulus characteristics
1.
Kagan proposed that infants develop schemas around 2 months, and prefer to look
at things that deviate moderately (but not greatly) from their schema (See Fig.
4-7)
2.
This discrepancy principle may explain preference for novelty
3.
Early in processing infants prefer to look at the familiar, switching to
preference for novelty once a stable representation has been stored
D.
Development of face processing
1.
Neonates may have a weak bias to attend to faces over other stimuli (strengthens
over the first few months)
2.
How might this bias be explained by evolutionary processes?
3.
Infants prefer “facelike” over “non-facelike” stimuli (See Fig. 4-8)
III.
Auditory development
A.
Auditory ability improves over the first year, reaching maturity around 10 years
B.
Infants most sensitive to higher-pitches, can distinguish voices, and have
auditory preferences
C.
Speech perception
1.
Infants distinguish between phonemes similarly to adults
2.
Young infants can distinguish between phonemes from any language, but lose this
ability for all languages except the one(s) they hear over the first postnatal
year
3.
Can recognize frequently heard sound patterns by 4.5 months
IV.
Combining senses (intermodal integration)
A.
Infants are able to integrate sound and picture, preferring to watch pictures
with matching sound; also prefer match of their videotaped leg movements with
proprioceptive information (i.e., input from two senses that is consistent)
B.
Intermodal matching--Recognizing by one sense what has been perceived via
another sense
C.
Intersensory redundancy hypothesis
1.
Some stimuli provide information for more than one sense, such as the
co-occurring sound and sight of a bouncing ball.
Given experience with these intersensory redundant stimuli, babies begin
to attend to “amodal” properties of the stimuli (elements that are relevant to
multiple senses).
2.
Human and animal infants are prone to amodal information processing because it
unifies incoming sensory information; this helps them ignore irrelevant
information, leading to further development of perception, attention, and
cognition
V.
Infant cognition:
Violation-of-expectation method - infants look longer at events that
violate their expectations (physically impossible or “magical” events) of what
should happen
VI.
Core knowledge – babies are born with or quickly develop certain biases or
cognitive competencies of physical objects or events; common to all human
infants, and perhaps other species
A.
Object representation
B.
Object continuity and cohesion
1.
Object permanence
a.
Piaget
i.
object permanence first seen around 4 months, when baby will look for an object
if it is only partially covered
ii.
by 8 months can retrieve a hidden object, but still demonstrate the A-not-B
error
iii.
by 12 months can solve A-not-B tasks, but will not search for an object when it
has been moved from the place the baby expects it to be (invisible displacement)
iv.
true object permanence evident by 18 months
b.
More recent studies of object permanence
i.
the “violation of expectation” paradigm
ii.
looking time paradigm
c.
Findings vary depending on number of times sequence is viewed, or familiarity of
object (See Fig. 4-20)
Eight-month-old infants react with surprise when they see the impossible event staged for them. Their reaction implies that they remember where the toy was hidden. Infants appear to have a capacity for memory and thinking that greatly exceeds what Piaget claimed is possible during the sensorimotor period.
2.
Neo-nativist – infants are born with knowledge of object cohesion, continuity,
and contact
3.
architectural innateness for dealing with objects; processes are innate, not
knowledge
4.
Bogartz --infants are born with a domain-general set of mechanisms for
processing perceptual information; no innate object knowledge is needed
C.
Numerical representation
1.
Numerosity (determining number without counting) and ordinality (more than/less
than)
1.
Infants respond differently to arrays with different number of items
2.
10- to 12-month olds will choose box with more crackers, but only up to four
items; same pattern for rhesus monkeys
3.
6-month-olds can distinguish larger and smaller arrays of dots greater than 4,
but the difference in number of dots must be large
4.
This property also found for number of sounds
2.
Simple arithmetic
1.
5-month-olds appear to have rudimentary understanding of addition/subtraction
VIII.
Arguments against core knowledge
A.
Some argue that findings such as these can be explained without assuming innate
knowledge
B.
Current perception (what is seen now) can be compared to previously stored
perception (stored representation of earlier perception); increased looking time
at “novel” or “impossible” event due to increased processing time, and therefore
don’t require any innate understanding of physical properties
IX.
Category representation – to what extent are infants' categorical
representations similar to those of adults
A.
How measured – infants can habituate to a category just as they can habituate to
an individual stimulus
1.
Infants as young as 3 months can form perceptual categories
2.
The more exposure to the category the more finely they can discriminate category
members
3.
Categories formed can be as broad as mammals
4.
Categories likely based on perceptual similarities and experiences
B.
The structure of infants’ categories
1.
Infants appear to form a category prototype that can be used to identify new
category members (see Photo 4-3)
2.
However younger infants require stimuli that are typical, familiar to form a
category
X.
What is infant cognition made of
A.
Some of the apparent cognitive competencies seen in infants may be domain
specific (e.g. processing faces)
B.
Other types of skills may be domain general (e.g., understanding objects)
C.
Cognition of infants may not be qualitatively different from that of older
children; conceptual knowledge may coexist with sensorimotor processing
D.
Others suggest that rather than ask when a particular skill develops, ask about
the developmental sequence of a particular skill