Lecture Information:
Further Implications for Classical Conditioning
Subsequent researchers in Classical Conditioning found that there were
more than just conditioning phenomena happening when an association was
established. What they found was that there were three more
modalities that were playing a part in the process as well. The
researchers observed the following phenomena:
-
Generalization
-
When a stimulus
is similar enough to the Conditioned Stimulus (CS) that it
causes a Conditioned Response (CR).
-
Example: Two beakers clink together in the same lab as
Pavlov's dogs and the dogs start to salivate again.
-
In the
classroom, a student who has severe test anxiety might also have
the same reaction to worksheets in that they are similar enough
in appearance that it causes the same panic-like reaction.
-
Discrimination
-
When a stimulus
is different enough from the Conditioned Stimulus (CS) that it
does not cause a Conditioned Response (CR).
-
Example: The keys jangling on the janitors belt does
not cause Pavlov's dogs to salivate in the lab.
-
In the
classroom again, that same student with test-anxiety, from the
above example, would look at a spelling bee and have no panic
reaction at all.
-
Extinction
-
When the
Conditioned Stimulus (CS) is presented without the Unconditioned
Stimulus (US) the result over many repetitions is a gradual
lessening of the conditioning.
-
Example: If Pavlov presents the bell to the dog over
and over again without also presenting the meat at least
occasionally, then the amount of saliva produced will
diminish with every ringing of the bell until the bell no
longer produces any saliva at all.
-
In the
classroom again, the student with test-anxiety can be very, very
slowly reintroduced to tests in ways that do not produce the
same panic reaction until the student is taking tests again with
all of the other students. This kind of extinction
treatment could take months and should not be hurried for any
reason.
Back to Lesson 7 Index