Endogenous Pedagogy (Radical
Constructivism)
-
Location of Knowledge:
-
The location of
the knowledge base for a radical constructivist would be deep
inside the learner. The radical constructivist believes
that the uniqueness of each individuals perspective leads to an
equally unique experience of life which in turn leads to an
equally unique knowledge set. To a radical constructivist,
if a system of interrelated meanings works well for them, then
that is all the validation that is needed.
-
Content:
-
A radical
constructivists approach truly validates a learners own unique
understanding on a given subject. The expectation is
that each learner's knowledge base will be fundamentally
different from all other learner's knowledge base. For a
radical constructivist, all knowledge is as valid, credible, or
believable as its usefulness to the learner.
-
Values:
-
This approach highly values each individual's
approach to learning. If a learner has to be juggling
bowling balls in order to mentally process a challenge then that
is what they are encouraged to do. The emphasis here is on
discovery learning, getting personally involved in the problem
solving, inventing new or more efficient ways of processing
information. If a learner cannot find a model to pattern
their work after, then they are encouraged to simply create a
way. Discovery! Invention! Creativity!
-
Role
of the Teacher:
-
The role of an endogenous teacher in the
classroom is far different that of an exogenous teacher.
An endogenous teacher tries very hard to minimize lecturing the
students. Instead they set up fairly broadly defined
learning activities and turn the students loose. The
teacher is much more in the role of facilitator. The
teacher will wait for students to ask questions, and then try to
help them accomplish what they want to accomplish. The
teacher is like another expert resource for students. At
times students might need some encouragement to continue their
"discovery" so the teacher will act as moral booster as well.
-
Assessment:
-
Grading is
always rather problematic in this approach. A true
endogenous teacher would prefer narrative evaluations of student
work rather than letter grades. However, since letter
grades are far more common in the public schools, they are
forced to make professional judgments and assign grades.
By far the most common method of assessment for this approach is
individual project work. Performance of a skill set, such
as a musical composition or Golf swing would also be very
useful.
-
Metaphor:
-
The best
metaphor to describe this approach would be that of a river that
is "a mile deep but an inch wide." It is the exact
opposite of the exogenous approach. While discovering a
scientific principle for themselves leads to a rich, deeply
meaningful memory for the student, it is usually a very slow
process in coming to fruition as well. There simply is a
finite amount of time that a student is in your class, so while
you can't cover as much material, you can get really deep into
what you do cover.
-
Student Behavior:
-
A student who prefers this style of learning would likely be the one
who raises her hand and says something like, "When am I ever
going to use this in my life? I mean really???!!" They
get frustrated easily with sitting and just getting talked at.
They might even begin arguments with the teacher just to liven
things up and make the experience more real for them.
Back to Lesson 11 Index
|