1.
Two economies, Hare and Tortoise, each start with a real GDP per person of $5000
in 1950. Real GDP per person grows 3% per year in Hare and 1% per year in
Tortoise. In the year 2000, what will be real GDP per person in each economy?
Make a guess first; then use a calculator to get the answer.
2.
For a particular economy, the following capital input K and labor input N were
reported in four different years:
Year
K
N
1
200
1000
2
250
1000
3
250
1250
4
300
1200
The production
function in this economy is
Y = K0.3N0.7,
Where Y is the
total output.
a.
Find the total output, the capital-labor ratio, and output per worker in each
year. Compare year 1 with year 3 and year 2 with year 4. Can this production
function be written in per worker form? If do, write algebraically the
per-worker form of the production function.
b.
Repeat Part (a) but assume now that the
production function is
Y = K0.3N0.8.
3.
An economy has the per-worker production function
yt = 3kt0.5
Where yt
is output per worker and kt is the capital-labor ration. The
depreciation rate is 0.1, and the population growth rate is 0.5. Saving is
St =0.3Yt,
Where St
is the total national saving and Yt is total output.
a.
What are the steady-state values of the capital-labor ration, output per worker,
and consumption per worker?
The rest of the problem shows the effects of changes in the three fundamental
determinants of long-run living standards.
b.
Repeat part (a) for a saving rate of 0.4 instead of 0.3.
c.
Repeat part (a) for a population growth rate of 0.08 (with a saving rate of
0.3).
d.
Repeat part (a) for a production function of
yt =4kt0.5.
Assume that the saving rate and population growth rate are at their original
values.
4.
Consider a closed economy in which the population grows at the rate of 1% per
year. The per-worker production function is y=6√k , where y is output per worker
and k is capital per worker. The depreciation rate of capital is 14% per year.
a.
Households consume 90% of income and save the remaining 10% of income. There is
no government. What are the steady-state values of capital per worker, output
per worker, consumption per worker, and investment per worker?
b.
Suppose that the country wants to increase its steady-state value of output per
worker. What steady-state value of the capital-labor ration is needed to double
the steady-state value of output per capita? What fraction of income would
households have to save to achieve a steady-state level of output per worker
that is twice as high as in Part (a)?
5.
Both population and the work force grow at the rate of n = 1% per year in a
closed economy. Consumption is C = 0.5(1-t)Y, where t is the tax rate on income
and Y is the total output. The per-worker production function is y = 8√k , where
y is output per worker and k is the capital-labor ration. The depreciation rate
of capital is d = 9% per year. Suppose for now that there are no government
purchases and the tax rate on income is t = 0
a.
Find expressions for national saving per worker and the steady-state level of
investment per worker as functions of the capital-labor ratio, k. In the steady
state, what are the values of the capital-labor ratio, output worker,
consumption per worker, and investment per worker?
b.
Suppose that the government purchases goods each year and pays for these
purchases using taxes on income. The government runs a balanced budget in each
period and the tax rate on income is t = 0.5.
Repeat Part (a) and compare your results.
6.
According to Solow model, how would each of the following affect consumption per
worker in the long run (that is, in the steady state)? Explain and illustrate
your answers with graphs.
a.
The destruction of a portion of the nation’s capital stock in a war.
b.
A permanent increase in the rate of immigration (which raises the overall
population growth rate).
c.
A permanent increase in energy prices.
d.
A temporary rise in the saving rate,
e.
A permanent increase in the fraction of the population in the labor force (the
population growth rate is unchanged).
REAL WORLD DATA
1.
This problem asks you to do your own growth accounting exercise. Using data
since 1948, make a table of annual
growth rates of real GDP, the capital stock (private fixed asset from BEA web
site,
www.bea.gov, Table 6.1, or FRED, or
Economagic), and civilian employment.
Assuming ak = 0.3 and aN = 0.7, find the productivity
growth rate for each year.
a.
Graph the contributions to overall economic growth of capital growth, labor
growth, and productivity growth for the period since 1948. Contrast the behavior
of each of these variables in the post-1973 period to their behavior in the
earlier period.
b.
Compare the post-1973 behavior of productivity growth with the graph of the
relative price of energy, shown in Figure 3.12. To what extent do you think the
productivity slow down can be blamed on high energy prices?
2.
Graph U.S. capital-labor ratio since 1948 (use private fixed assets from the BEA
Web site,
www.bea.gov, Table 6.1 as the measure of
labor). Do you see evidence of convergence to a steady state during the postwar
period? Now graph real output and real consumption per worker for the same
period. According to the Solow model, what are the two basic explanations for
the upward trends in these two variables? Can output per worker and consumption
per worker continue to grow even if the capital-labor ratio stops rising?
3.
According to the Solow model, if countries differed primarily in temrs of their
capital-labor ratios, with rich countries having high capital-labor ratios and
poor countries that have a lower real GDP per capita income should grow faster
than countries with a higher real GDP per capita. (This prediction of the Solow
model assumes that countries have similar saving rates, population growth rate,
and production functions.) You can test this idea using the Penn World Tables at
pwt.econ.upenn.edu. Pick a group of ten countries and examine their initial
levels of real GDP per capita in a year long ago, such as 1950. Then calculate
the average growth rate of real GDP per capita since that initial year. Do your
results suggest that countries that initially have lower real GDP per capita
indeed grow faster than countries that initially have a higher real GDP per
capita?