|
English Structures No, this sound isn't language, but it has meaning and it communicates.
No, this isn't language, but again it is assigned meaning and so it is a type of communication.
No,this sound that humans make is not considered language, but is is generally assigned meaning, so it is a type of communication.
No, Wingtip doesn't do something like point at potential prey and then give the sign for begging which would be a creative way to say, "There's a gopher out there. Will you go get it and feed it to me?"
No, the sign didn't have to be learned, so its relationship to its meaning will not change in the future.
No, Wingtip was not trained to point; he does this naturally. The meaning of the sign isn't achieved by agreement among users of this sign. It is shared through instinct.
No, Wingtip never makes this sign without some presence of the prey in existence. That is, Wingtip doesn't communicate about things that happened in the past or in the future. As a result, Wingtip's sign fails to include the key feature of an arbitrary relationship between the sign and its meaning. Wingtip's communication style doesn't meet this requirement of language.
Yes, Wingtip only points when he senses some potential prey by seeing it or smelling it. He never uses this sign to point at something that isn't there.
No, Wingtip's sign doesn't look like what the potential prey looks like, so it isn't an iconic sign.
Understanding the Features of Language
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Understanding the Humanness of Language We have just looked at how language has the features of meaningfulness, creativity, and systematicity. Earlier we looked at some samples of possible language and decided which ones were actually language use and which ones were not. We decided that animal communication is not language communication. Now that we have explained the features of language, we can probe into why animal communication is different from human communication. Activity: Analyzing animal communication for the features of language Look at the picture below of my dog, Wingtip. Then look at the questions about Wingtip's communication style and click on the answer yes or no to determine if the dog's communication style includes the features of language that we have just learned.
First consider what Wingtip's sign means. Humans generally call this sign pointing.Wingtip points at gophers, birds, crickets, cheese, and rubber balls. Wingtip never points at his bed or my hand.
Select the door with the correct answer:
Next, consider the kind of sign that Wingtip is using.
Now, consider the meaningfulness of the sign. How did this sign get meaning?
Now consider the creativity of Wingtip's communication style.
Humanness Human language uses symbols to communicate. Animal systems use signals, not symbols; therefore, animals do not use language.
Distinguishing Language from Communication In describing the humanness of language, we have set out to distinguish it from animal communication. One of the key ideas to keep in mind when studying language is that communication and language are not the same thing. If we look closely at the definition of langauge, "Language is a system of arbitrary symbols that humans use to create meaningful communication with other users of the same language," we can see that language is used in service to communication. That is, it is a tool or a technique for achieving the goal of communication. This suggests that there are other tools and other techniques available for achieving communication, as well. This is precisely the point we have just sought to make through the analysis exercise: Wingtip doesn't use language to communicate, but dogs do communicate through other types of systems. These systems seem to be based entirely on indexical/symptomatic signs, however, not symbols. This leads to another question: Do humans ever use indexical/symptomatic signs to communicate? Activity: Looking for nonlanguage communication by humans Is this language? ( samples may change)
As the exercise just demonstrated, humans do communicate in ways other than language. Language is just one subdivision of communication. There are two others that exist and are used by humans. Each of the three subdivisions is given a technical name: 1) linguistics refers to the language subdivision, 2) paralinguistics refers to the subdivision of nonlanguage vocalizations, and 3) extralinguistics refers to the subdividsion of nonvocal communication. The table below gives technical terms and examples of each type.
The Subdivisions of Linguistics As mentioned above, there are three types of communication. One of these types is linguistic communication, which refers to communication through language. The academic field of linguistics is concerned with the study of languages. The field of linguistics seeks to describe the nature of language in general and the nature of individual languages in particular. In general, all languages have six different aspects, which are listed in the table above and defined below:
While all human languages have sounds or signs, not all languages use exactly the same ones or even the same number. Likewise, all human languages have rules for putting sounds together to form words and word parts as well as rules for putting those words together into phrases and sentences. When linguists look to describe language in general, they seek to identify features that all languages have in common. These common features are referred to as language universals. The list below gives examples of some of the language universals that have been identified. Language Universals
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||